pp342744d8.png
pp2fe839b6.png
pp7c10256b.png
ppb05daa3b.png
pp7eba8164.png
pp44a8a425.png
pp4922d0a8.png
pp8f5232d6.png
pp576c1fe2.png
ppde1f6cca.png
pp4f8aff86.png
pp41f5afff.png
ppc2d70e9c.png
pp62e42693.png
pp6ade510e.png
ppcb3976de.png
pp56e004e5.png
pp43470536.png
pp6ad9497f.png
ppa9dd549a.png
blokey.gif
pp5be39f25.gif
pp7e835c5d.png
ppb3d10d21.png
Board expressed the view that this was a matter for the several unions to decide on,
having regard to the wishes of their players."

Howard Marshall - of Haileybury, Oxford, Harlequins and the Barbarians and for years
the rugby correspondent of the Daily Telegraph - wrote in 1936 in an article entitled
What Rugger Means to Me: " Here I must make what is probably my last protest against
the numbering of players. I remember how I resented this cattle-branding when I was
playing myself, and my unholy delight when the numbered jerseys did not correspond
with the programmes. Rugby football is not a game for such fripperies as numbering
and programmes; it is not a game to be watched by any but those who have played it
and understand it."

In 1933 soccer players were numbered at the FA Cup Final for the first time. Everton,
who won, played Manchester City. Everton were numbered 1-11, Manchester City 12-
22. Celtic still refuse to wear numbers on their backs.

Sometimes teams have worn letters - to confuse pirate programme sellers. The All
Blacks did that in 1921.

Confusing pirate programme sellers was not the only reason.
There was also the belief that a single letter was less confusing than two numbers. The
pp6b152b1e.png